Although this document has been considered by some as a licence to crenellate the current opinion rejects this as a licence to crenellate.
Cited as being licenced, but Conyers was chief supporter of Bishop against usurpation by William Comyn in 1143, so more a fortification by necessity than by consent. King notes the document but did not consider it a licence to crenellate. Not, in a meaningful sense, a licence to crenellate although has been called this by some.
Significant later source are;
More details about licences to crenellate can be found here.
Please let me know if you see any errors, can add information or can otherwise help to improve this resource. Contact me